Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

  1. May 1, 2019 · We interpret this as potential evidence of the domain-specificity of prestige and dominance hierarchies, in that individuals who had attained their prestige or dominance through the group's regular activity were not nominated to represent the group on an unrelated task (the quiz).

    • View PDF

      individuals with high dominance or prestige ratings also...

  2. In evolutionary psychology and evolutionary anthropology, dual strategies theory states humans increase their status in social hierarchies using two major strategies known as dominance and prestige. The first and oldest of the two strategies, dominance , is exemplified by the use of force, implied force or other forms of coercion to take social power .

  3. By domain-specific prestige-bias we mean that individuals choose to learn from a prestigious model only within the domain of expertise in which the model acquired their prestige. By domain-general prestige-bias we mean that individuals choose to learn from prestigious models in general, regardless of the domain in which their prestige was earned.

  4. Jan 1, 2016 · This article focuses on two strategies—dominance and prestige—that have played a key role in regulating human hierarchies throughout history. Dominance reflects a repertoire of behaviors, cognitions, and emotions aimed at attaining social rank through coercion, intimidation, and the selfish manipulation of group resources.

    • J.K. Maner, C.R. Case, C.R. Case
    • 2016
  5. individuals with high dominance or prestige ratings also received more visual attention than those with low dominance or prestige ratings. Our aim here is to extend and verify the findings reviewed above concerning the viability of prestige and dominance as strategies for attaining status within groups. We repeated Cheng et al.’s [1] general

    • Charlotte Olivia Brand, Alex Mesoudi
    • 2019
  6. Work by Cheng and colleagues (2013) suggests that both dominance and prestige serve as viable strategies for attaining influence within newly formed groups. After a group task, undergraduates rated one another on dominance and prestige. Both dominance and pres tige predicted people's influence over group decisions.

  7. People also ask

  8. Oct 31, 2019 · How humans and other social species form social hierarchies is one of the oldest puzzles of the behavioral and biological sciences. Considerable evidence now indicates that in humans social stratification is principally based jointly on dominance (coercive capacity based on strength, threat, and intimidation) and prestige (persuasive capacity based on skills, abilities, and knowledge).

  1. People also search for