Search results
Mar 14, 2017 · Abstract. Weber's proposal that social science should aim to be value neutral is now widely rejected. However, I argue that his position was more sophisticated than is generally recognised, and that it is for the most part sound. Clarification of his position is provided, along with an outline of the reasons why it came to be rejected.
- Martyn Hammersley
- 2017
Feb 20, 2021 · Despite this fact, sociologists should still strive for value neutrality. Value neutrality, as described by Max Weber, is the duty of sociologists to identify and acknowledge their own values and overcome their personal biases when conducting sociological research. In order to be value-neutral, sociologists must be aware of their own moral ...
- Introduction
- Clearing Away Some Misconceptions
- Clarifying The Nature of Value Neutrality
- Value Relevance
- Has Social Science Ever Practised Value Neutrality?
- Arguments For Normative Sociology
- Conclusion
1.1Recurrent debates over the past century about the role of values in social inquiry have not led to much progress in resolving this issue. Instead, there have been swings in prevailing views, frequently based on shifting taken-for-granted assumptions. In Anglo-American sociology during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries the predomi...
2.1 An important starting point, against the background of longstanding misinterpretation of Weber's work, is to emphasise that he cannot legitimately be treated as a positivist, in any productive sense of that term; a tendency that is not uncommon in discussions of his concept of value neutrality. The word 'positivism' has, of course, come to be u...
3.1As already noted, part of the difficulty in resolving the issue of whether social inquiry should be normative or objective and value neutral lies in uncertainty and confusion over the meaning of key terms. There are at least three definitional matters that need attention here: 3.2There are two key senses given to the term 'values': 3.3 That we f...
4.1 The other, equally important, component of Weber's argument, alongside value neutrality, is that social research must be value-relevant. Following neo-Kantian philosophy, particularly that of Rickert, Weber argued that, unlike natural science, social research focuses on describing and explaining individual phenomena, rather than on producing kn...
5.1 One of the arguments deployed against commitment to the principle of value neutrality is that it has never actually been practised, and indeed that it cannot be; that, in effect, it is an ideological smokescreen for the necessarily partisan character of all research (see, for example, Horkheimer 1972). It is true that while, in the middle part ...
6.1 Any commitment to a normative approach needs either to be able to show how, on its own, research can justify particular normative conclusions and disqualify others, or to indicate how research studies investigating the same phenomena committed to conflicting normative ideals can be tolerated, and why they should be. While some social scientists...
7.1The principles of value neutrality and objectivity are widely rejected today, in name at least; and social scientists frequently present value conclusions as if these had been validated by research. Yet there is little clarity about the basis for these value conclusions, or about why they are believed to be legitimate. Most of the justificatory ...
tellects discern that they are goods for us (Finnis, 1980). The empirical method of sociology does not tell us which of these theories of value is correct. Sociologists may find value neutrality desirable for reasons other than its con. nection with a particular theory of value (emotivism), or because advocating.
- 20160802020443Z
of value-neutrality and the principle of criticism. Both principles are of vital importance in the social sciences, but both seem to conflict with one another. The principle of criticism excludes value-judgments from the social sciences, because they cannot be empirically tested. Hence, criticism methodologically implies value-neutrality.
Feb 13, 2024 · The New Right. Postmodernism. In sociology, the term “value free” refers to the idea that the methods and practices of science should not be influenced by the personal values or biases of the sociologist conducting the research. This concept is also known as “value neutrality.”. The principle of being value-free was proposed by Max ...
People also ask
Should social science aim to be value neutral?
Should sociologists strive for value neutrality?
Do social scientists institutionalize value-neutral research?
Should sociologists strive for value-free research?
How can sociologists be value-neutral?
What values should researchers try to be neutral towards?
There are two One is making value judgments, that is, interpreting the. server's own value platform; such an attitude is most claims absolute relevance to a culturally relative and. set of values. The other is value neutrality, the maximally. pretation of social phenomena, no matter how emotionally these may be.
