Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

  1. 1 day ago · Efforts to undermine trust in scientists, especially federal science and scientists, can in turn weaken evidence-based decision making. This is why scientific integrity is so important. Scientists follow the data, and with solid scientific integrity policies , scientists have the freedom to make their results public and describe their findings rather than having their work derailed by profit ...

    • Common Arguments
    • Popper and The Scientific Method
    • Majority Rules
    • The Bottom Line

    One thought that might initially spring to mind is we ought to trust scientists because what they say is true. But there are problems with this. One is the question of whether what a scientist says is, in fact, the truth. Sceptics will point out scientists are just humans and remain prone to making mistakes. Also, if we look at the history of scien...

    One influential answer to the question of why we should trust scientists is because they use the scientific method. This, of course, raises the question: what is the scientific method? Possibly the best-known account is offered by science philosopher Karl Popper, who has influenced an Einstein Medal-winning mathematical physicist and Nobel Prize wi...

    Recently, an answer to the question was further articulated in a bookby science historian Naomi Oreskes. Oreskes acknowledges the importance Popper placed on the role of attempting to refute a theory, but also emphasises the social and consensual element of scientific practice. For Oreskes, we have reason to trust science because, or to the extent ...

    This does not necessarily mean we ought to uncritically accept everything scientists say. There is of course a difference between a single isolated scientist or small group saying something, and there being a consensus within the scientific community that something is true. And, of course, for a variety of reasons – some practical, some financial, ...

  2. Mar 4, 2024 · Although trust in science remains high, public questions scientists' adherence to science's norms. ScienceDaily . Retrieved November 14, 2024 from www.sciencedaily.com / releases / 2024 / 03 ...

  3. Dec 13, 2023 · Yet, as COVID-19 raged, millions of people refused to take vaccines because they did not trust the science behind them. Less than one in four Republicans see climate change as a major threat. In the book, Why Trust Science, Oreskes argues why we should trust science and how to restore trust in science. Oreskes is a historian of science at ...

  4. Dec 27, 2022 · Why should the public trust science? The instrumental successes science has facilitated (e.g., eliminating smallpox, airplanes, the internet, etc.) provide one possible answer, but this does not consider past instrumental failures, where the promises of science have failed to deliver or brought unwelcome effects with them (e.g., failures to handle nuclear waste (Jacoby, 2020), worldwide ...

  5. About Science (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1985), 82 (and see ch. 3, passim, for an excellent sociological appreciation of the role of trust and authority in science). As Hardwig ("The Role of Trust in Knowledge," 697) nicely puts it: "Knowing [is] not a privileged psychological state. If it is a privileged state at all, it is a privileged social ...

  6. People also ask

  7. Mar 4, 2024 · Beyond measurements of trust in science. The Annenberg Public Policy Center's ASK survey in February 2023 asked U.S. adults more nuanced questions about attitudes toward scientists.

  1. People also search for