Search results
Mar 13, 2024 · More concretely, we should be working towards a world without extreme wealth. That view is called limitarianism – a moral and political upper limit to how much personal wealth any one individual can have.
Apr 8, 2024 · There should be no upper limit to wealth as long as the economic pie is growing and the poor are getting some of it. It doesn’t matter if the rich are getting much richer—they create wealth. Why should we care about the top, the upper limit, that you discuss in your book? Ingrid Robeyns.
Aug 1, 2024 · An easier and far more effective way to end plutocracy is through the power of democracy via a binding referendum that calls on citizens to decide whether or not we should abolish altogether extreme wealth.
Apr 5, 2024 · Developed countries with adequate social safety nets, such as her native Netherlands, should impose a limit of €10 million (£8.5 million) on individual personal wealth, according to Robeyns....
Apr 1, 2024 · “After a decade of analyzing and debating extreme wealth, I became convinced that we must create a world in which no one is super-rich—that there must be a cap on the amount of wealth any one...
Oct 18, 2024 · Safra Center for Ethics debate weighs extreme wealth, philanthropy, income inequality, and redistribution. Billionaires devote vast sums of money to anti-poverty initiatives and green energy reforms. But the world’s wealthiest also cause disproportionate harm to the environment.
People also ask
Should we be working towards a world without extreme wealth?
What is wrong with extreme wealth?
Should we limit wealth?
Should wealth go to the people with the least?
Does extreme wealth confer a lot of political power?
Would an ecologically just world have become so rich?
Jun 24, 2019 · One may ask whether there is anything wrong if, in societies or globally, there are some people who own extreme amounts of wealth. Should our focus not be on the disadvantaged, trying to ensure that they can escape poverty?