Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

1. • 
     • The short answer is yes, especially when the article aligns with your expertise! Doing peer review for a journal is a fantastic opportunity. You'll: Gain experience with the latest research ideas in your field. Get access to an article before it is published. Have the chance to gain key transferable skills assessing the work of others.
     www.aje.com/arc/how-to-become-a-peer-reviewer-for-journals/

     How to Become a Peer Reviewer for Journals - AJE

2. People also ask

   Why is peer review important?

   • Peer review is a critically important service for maintaining quality in the scientific literature. Peer review of a scientific manuscript and the associated reviewer's report should assess specific details related to the accuracy, validity, novelty, and interpretation of a study's results.

   How to be a good reviewer: A step‐by‐step guide for approaching peer

   onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/lio2.1266

   See all results for this question

   What are the responsibilities of a peer reviewer?

   • tional afiliation of the author(s).• Reviewers must declare any conflict of interest bef re agreeing to review a manuscript. This includes any relationship with th author that may bias their review.• Reviewers must keep t e peer review process confidential. They must not share information or correspondence about a manuscript with anyone

   A guide to becoming a peer reviewer - Editor Resources

   editorresources.taylorandfrancis.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/A-guide-to-becoming-a-peer-reviewer.pdf

   See all results for this question

   What is a scientific peer review?

   • A review of the history and an overview of the modern-day peer review process are provided with attention to the role played by the reviewer, including important reasons for involvement in scientific peer review. The general components of a scientific peer review are described, and a model for how to structure a peer review report is provided.

   How to be a good reviewer: A step‐by‐step guide for approaching peer

   onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/lio2.1266

   See all results for this question

   What makes a good peer reviewer?

   • For many universities, involvement as a peer reviewer may also contribute toward national/international “service” criteria for academic promotion. Being a good reviewer begins with the decision to accept or decline a peer review invitation. Peer review invitations should be responded to, whether to accept or decline.

   How to be a good reviewer: A step‐by‐step guide for approaching peer

   onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/lio2.1266

   See all results for this question

   Should you proofread a peer review?

   • As recommended in this Peer Review webinar, once you have completed your review, it can be helpful to proofread your comments and simultaneously compare what you’ve written to the reviewer tone table. Bias can slip into your writing at any time, so it’s always smart to take a step back and consider how your tone could be perceived.

   The Dos and Don’ts of Peer Reviewing - Eos

   eos.org/editors-vox/the-dos-and-donts-of-peer-reviewing

   See all results for this question

   What should be included in a peer review?

   • Reviews should not call the authors’ qualifications into question. Instead, reviewers should elaborate on where the science or writing is lacking. Never Include Personal Attacks Reviews should be unbiased, respectful, and constructive. Personal attacks that call an author’s character into question should never be included in a peer review.

   The Dos and Don’ts of Peer Reviewing - Eos

   eos.org/editors-vox/the-dos-and-donts-of-peer-reviewing

   See all results for this question

3. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › articles › PMC9820852How to Be a Great Peer Reviewer - PMC - PubMed Central (PMC)

   pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › articles › PMC9820852

   Peer review should be comprehensive, succinct, and accurate, and comment on the importance, novelty, and impact of the study. 1,5 It is helpful to give constructive feedback to their colleagues since respectful comments are the key to a good peer review.

   • Peer review guidance: a primer for researchers - PMC

     The peer review process is essential for evaluating the...

4. onlinelibrary.wiley.com › doi › fullHow to be a good reviewer: A step-by-step guide for ...

   onlinelibrary.wiley.com › doi › full

   Jun 4, 2024 · Peer review is a critically important service for maintaining quality in the scientific literature. Peer review of a scientific manuscript and the associated reviewer's report should assess specific details related to the accuracy, validity, novelty, and interpretation of a study's results.

5. Videos

   • 

     3:03

     youtube.com

     What It Means to Be a Peer Reviewer

     Aug 19, 2020

     27.1K Views

   • 

     58:23

     youtube.com

     Why YOU Should Be a Peer Reviewer | Bentham Science Webinar

     Oct 17, 2024

     20 Views

   • 

     4:51

     youtube.com

     How to Write Effective Peer Review Comments

     Aug 19, 2020

     96.9K Views

   View all

6. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › articles › PMC7944958Peer review guidance: a primer for researchers - PMC

   pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › articles › PMC7944958

   The peer review process is essential for evaluating the quality of scholarly works, suggesting corrections, and learning from other authors’ mistakes. The principles of peer review are largely based on professionalism, eloquence, and collegiate attitude.

7. eos.org › editors-vox › the-dos-and-donts-of-peerThe Dos and Don’ts of Peer Reviewing - Eos

   eos.org › editors-vox › the-dos-and-donts-of-peer

   Sep 27, 2023 · Reviews should be unbiased, respectful, and constructive. Personal attacks that call an author’s character into question should never be included in a peer review.

8. www.cambridge.org › core › journalsPeer reviewing made easier: your questions answered

   www.cambridge.org › core › journals

   • Cached

   Why do peer reviews? Who should do it? How to become a reviewer; What to do if invited to review? How long does it take? How do you approach a peer review? What do you write in a peer review? How to write a review when the paper is seriously substandard; Controversies in peer review; Where else can I find help as a reviewer? Conclusions ...

   • Author: Neel Halder, Peter Tyrer, Patricia Casey

   • Publish Year: 2021

9. febs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com › doi › fullHow to be a good peer reviewer of scientific manuscripts

   febs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com › doi › full

   Jan 23, 2021 · Peer review, the system by which manuscripts submitted for publication are evaluated by experts (peers) in a field, is the cornerstone of high-quality scholarly publishing.

10. editorresources.taylorandfrancis.com › wp-contentA guide to becoming a peer reviewer - Editor Resources

    editorresources.taylorandfrancis.com › wp-content

    Peer review, also known as refereeing, is a collaborative process that allows independent experts in the same field of research to evaluate and comment on manuscript submissions. The outcome of a peer review gives authors feedback to improve their work and, critically,