Search results
Brigadier-General Sir James Edmonds, in his article Wellington's Staff at Waterloo, published in the Journal of the Society for Army Historical Research in 1933, demonstrated that all but one of the officers manning the Brussels headquarters in June 1815 were Peninsula veterans.
On the morning of 16 June, Wellington rode to the Prussian headquarters for a personal meeting with Blücher, where the Duke was again to repeat his promises of support. As the Prince had such a high regard for Wellington, there can be little doubt that Blücher would believe whatever he was told.
Thus, it would seem that Wellington had misinformed his Prussian allies as to his movements and intentions, that he repeated this false information to the Prince of Orange and that he also misled Bathurst as to his true actions that day.
eral (i.e. chief of staff) for Wellington's information, which, they claimed, was erroneous, and misled the Duke to such an extent that he had, by accident, provided his allies with false information (Figure 2, Figure 3). The De Lancey Disposition At 7 a.m. on 16June 1815, De Lancey apparendy wrote the following
Wellington agreed to attack the French flank, but gave no firm decision. One would expect Dörnberg’s sympathies to lie with the British, the protectors of his homeland, and his paymasters.
He was not one of the untrained officers on Wellington's Staff. Sir Augustus Frazer writes of him after Waterloo: 'This is our greatest loss - none can be greater, public or private'; and Wellington: 'This officer is a serious loss to His Majesty's service, and to me at this moment'. 28.
People also ask
Who are the staff members at Wellington?
Who is Mr. Wellington?
What is a vignette of Wellington?
Apr 20, 2019 · Wellington, who excluded the commissaries and paymasters, performed office duties only, what his brother-in-law, Edward Pakenham, called ‘this insignificant clerking business’.
