Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

1. • • There is no shortage of theories of legal inter-pretation, with their corresponding favored methods for reading statutes or the Constitution: in statutory interpretation, pragmatism, textualism, intentionalism, and purposivism; and in constitutional interpretation, originalism in its many variants, moral readings, common law con-stitutionalism, and common good constitutionalism, just to name a few.
     columbialawreview.org/content/reasons-for-interpretation/

     REASONS FOR INTERPRETATION - Columbia Law Review

2. People also ask

   What are conceptual arguments for legal interpretation?

   • Conceptual arguments claim that a particular approach to legal interpretation follows from the concept of interpretation, the concept of law, the concept of authority, or some other relevant concept (e.g., Neale 2012 [Other Internet Resources]; see Berman 2009, 37–68).

   Legal Interpretation - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

   plato.stanford.edu/entries/legal-interpretation/

   See all results for this question

   How do you argue for a theory of legal interpretation?

   • How to Argue for and Evaluate Theories of Legal Interpretation In the literature on legal interpretation, theorists offer various arguments in favor of their preferred theories of legal interpretation. As noted, normative arguments, appealing to moral values such as democracy, fairness, and the rule of law, are the most common.

   Legal Interpretation - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

   plato.stanford.edu/entries/legal-interpretation/

   See all results for this question

   What are the main arguments in favor of legal interpretation?

   • The most important arguments in favor of this understanding of legal interpretation are the main arguments against the linguistic-meaning and dispute-resolution understandings.

   Legal Interpretation - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

   plato.stanford.edu/entries/legal-interpretation/

   See all results for this question

   What is the difference between legal interpretation and linguistic interpretation?

   • A different but related argument is that legal interpretation is an instance of linguistic interpretation, and linguistic interpretation seeks linguistic meaning (e.g., Soames, 2009; Alexander 2011). The former argument does not take us very far.

   Legal Interpretation - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

   plato.stanford.edu/entries/legal-interpretation/

   See all results for this question

   What is a theory of legal interpretation?

   • Thus, a theory of legal interpretation may provide guidance as to what kinds of evidence are most reliable. Differently, there may be legal or moral reasons – as opposed to reasons of accuracy – not to permit consulting certain kinds of evidence.

   Legal Interpretation - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

   plato.stanford.edu/entries/legal-interpretation/

   See all results for this question

   Does legal interpretation seek the content of the law?

   • In the preceding subsection, I relied on the simplifying assumption that, if legal interpretation seeks the content of the law, then whether a method of legal interpretation is correct depends only on whether it treats the determinants of the content of the law as contributing to the content of the law in the way that they in fact do so.

   Legal Interpretation - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

   plato.stanford.edu/entries/legal-interpretation/

   See all results for this question

3. plato.stanford.edu › entries › legal-interpretationLegal Interpretation - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

   plato.stanford.edu › entries › legal-interpretation

   Jul 7, 2021 · Conceptual arguments claim that a particular approach to legal interpretation follows from the concept of interpretation, the concept of law, the concept of authority, or some other relevant concept (e.g., Neale 2012 [Other Internet Resources]; see Berman 2009, 37–68).

4. Videos

   • 

     10:36

     youtube.com

     Episode 1.2: Understanding Arguments

     Aug 23, 2013

     325.3K Views

   • 

     0:58

     youtube.com

     Example of Inaccurate Legal Interpretation

     Feb 12, 2014

     78.1K Views

   • 

     13:49

     youtube.com

     Interpretation Law Introduction lecture/Meaning and Objectives of Interpretation llb notes

     Jun 24, 2022

     63.7K Views

   View all

5. plato.stanford.edu › entries › legal-reas-interpretInterpretation and Coherence in Legal Reasoning (Stanford ...

   plato.stanford.edu › entries › legal-reas-interpret

   May 29, 2001 · 1. What Do Legal Theorists Mean By ‘Legal Reasoning’? 2. The Role of Interpretation in Legal Reasoning: 2.1 Some Intellectual Roots Considered. 2.2 An Initial View of the Nature of Interpretation: Conservation and Creativity. 2.3 Locating Interpretation in Legal Reasoning. 2.4 Some Points of Disagreement.

6. onlinelibrary.wiley.com › doi › absLegal Interpretation, Conceptual Ethics, and Alternative ...

   onlinelibrary.wiley.com › doi › abs

   Nov 5, 2023 · The approach I explore asks questions about legal interpretation in a way that is tethered to what legal (or “legal-ish”) concepts people should deploy, as part of arguments on behalf of engaging in legal (or “legal-ish”) practices different from our current ones.

7. www.tandfonline.com › doi › fullHans Kelsen on legal interpretation, legal cognition, and ...

   www.tandfonline.com › doi › full

   Jun 14, 2019 · Legal science, on a narrower reading, examines the law qua object of legal cognition. Substituting legal cognition for traditional legal interpretation, Kelsen claims that legal cognition is constitutive of its object, a claim that requires a neo-Kantian transcendental argument for support.

   • Author: Stanley L. Paulson

   • Publish Year: 2019

8. link.springer.com › chapter › 10Between Authority and Interpretation: The Scope of Morality ...

   link.springer.com › chapter › 10

   • Cached

   Sep 2, 2021 · In this paper, I want to challenge some of Raz’s theses on legal reasoning, with his theory of law as background. Raz argues that legal interpretation and judicial adjudication are both fundamentally open to moral argument, where the voice of the legitimate legal authority is just a first voice.

9. academic.oup.com › book › 9667Arguing about Interpretation | Rhetoric and The Rule of Law ...

   academic.oup.com › book › 9667

   • Cached

   The categories of interpretative argument are, first, those that appeal to the linguistic context itself as a source of reasons for favouring one interpretation or another (‘linguistic’ arguments); secondly, those that look at the legal system as the special context of the authoritative text to see how best to make sense of it in that ...