Search results
Explore the types and examples of psychological contracts to better understand their impact on the employee employer relationship and expectations.
Oct 15, 2024 · What are the 4 types of psychological contracts? Understanding the different types of psychological contracts can help employers manage their teams more effectively. Transactional psychological contract. A transactional psychological contract is characterized by specific, short-term, and economic-focused agreements.
In this guide, we’ll delve into the concept of psychological contracts, explore their significance in the workplace, provide examples, and discuss their implications for both employees and employers.
Unlike the legal contract of employment, the psychological contract is not tangible. It’s built on the everyday actions and statements made by one party and how they are interpreted by the other. This factsheet explores the psychological contract in the context of the employment relationship.
According to Golembiewski (2000), there are four types of psychological contract. The first type generated in the 19th century, named as “command” – where the employees were forced to obey the rules of supervisor for survival purpose in the organization.
Types of Psychological Contracts. Psychological contracts are key in setting what employees and employers expect from each other. These agreements are not written down but are very important. They shape how things work in the workplace. Transactional Contracts. Transactional contracts are about short-term deals. They are clear and direct.
People also ask
How many types of psychological contracts are there?
What is a psychological contract?
What is a transactional psychological contract?
How psychological contract plays a major role in employee and employer relationship?
What is a balanced psychological contract?
What is a breach in a psychological contract?
The term psychological contract refers to the often unspoken set of expectations and assumptions that two parties (employees and the organisation, its leaders and managers) have of each other about things like how they will behave and act.
