Search results
Nov 3, 2021 · 1. Historical Context. Scientific pluralism, as an explicit program in philosophy of science, is of relatively recent origin. Motivated by cases for both historical and contemporary diversity of scientific methods and theories (Kuhn 1962; Feyerabend 1965), post-war philosophers of science increasingly argued that plurality is not a problem but rather a productive feature of successful science.
- Author and Citation Info
We would like to show you a description here but the site...
- Author and Citation Info
of Science, authored by investigators of any origin or professional filiation, published in the five years previous to the year of the Prize’s edition. According to the terms of the Prize’s regulations, the winner is requested, on
Sep 5, 2022 · Although the interconnection between science and the humanities has a long history, ‘scientific culture’ triggering widespread interest as a specific concept is a more recent phenomenon. Specifically, it can be traced back to the famous lecture given by British physicist and novelist Charles Percy Snow at Cambridge University in 1959.
- Meifang Zhang
Whereas epistemic relativism (ER) does not enjoy great popularity amongst philosophers of science, another position, scientific pluralism (SP), certainly does. 1 Defenders of SP are concerned about the question of whether SP entails ER. One intrinsic feature of almost every monograph defending a particular version of SP includes a section on why SP does not entail ER.
Feb 8, 2021 · On the one hand, his paper discusses “what good historiography should look like, if we accept pluralism about science—which is to say, how pluralism about science leads to pluralism in the history of science”. Chang’s presentism is, on the other hand, linked to acknowledgement of the retrospective and perspectival nature of historiography: the historian is “immersed” in the present ...
- Matteo Vagelli, Laurent Loison, Laurent Loison, Ivan Moya-Diez
- 2021
Jun 23, 2022 · Scientific pluralism has been part of the philosophical discourse on science since at least the 1960s. Pluralism has become an irresistible philosophical stance in the wake of historical and social studies of science that have rightly rediscovered the very many ways of knowing displayed by scientific communities across the history of science and across cultures.
People also ask
What are the historical roots of scientific pluralism?
Is scientific pluralism an explicit program for philosophy of Science?
Is pluralism a philosophical stance?
Why are there pluralisms in science studies?
Is scientific pluralism a new paradigm?
Is scientific pluralism a counter-program to unity of Science?
The Many Unities of Science:: Politics, Semantics, and Ontology Download; XML; Perspectival Pluralism Download; XML; Plurality and Complementarity in Quantum Dynamics Download; XML; Pluralism and the Foundations of Mathematics Download; XML; Pluralisms in Economics Download; XML; Theoretical Pluralism and the Scientific Study of Behavior ...