Search results
Mar 21, 2022 · Last month, a jury in Texas delivered a stunning $70 million verdict in favor of 10 employees who worked for Glow Networks. Nine of the ten plaintiffs were Black employees. The case, Yarbrough, et ...
Jun 29, 2022 · On February 18, 2022, a Texas jury returned a verdict of $70 Million Dollars for ten race discrimination and retaliation plaintiffs, who asserted claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (“Section 1981”). The Yarbrough Plaintiffs asserted no claims under Title VII. The Yarbrough Plaintiffs alleged discrimination in the workplace at Glow Networks.
Sep 30, 2023 · September 30, 2023/ Christopher McKinney. In a groundbreaking verdict last year, a Dallas, Texas area jury delivered a resounding blow against employment discrimination, awarding $70 million in favor of 10 employees who had worked for Glow Networks. This case, known as Yarbrough, et al. v. Glow Networks, Inc., serves as a stark reminder of the ...
Feb 26, 2022 · So Yarbrough and nine other former employees sued Glow Networks and its parent company, CSS Corp., for racial discrimination. A federal jury in North Texas this month agreed with the workers ...
Feb 26, 2022 · Yarbrough then joined nine other former employees in suing Glow Networks and its parent company, CSS Corp., for racial discrimination, and a federal jury agreed with their complaint.
Apr 23, 1986 · Yarbrough's refusal, Burgess claims, constituted insubordination in violation of the collective bargaining agreement between Tower and Yarbrough's union. On December 14, 1982, Yarbrough brought suit against Tower and Burgess pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981. The jury returned a verdict against both defendants on liability and, following a hearing ...
People also ask
What did Yarbrough do for Racial Discrimination?
What does the Yarbrough jury verdict say about employment discrimination?
Did the Yarbrough plaintiffs claim retaliation under Title VII?
How much damages did glow networks claim in the Yarbrough case?
Who were the plaintiffs in Yarbrough V glow networks?
What retaliation did a jury award in a discrimination case?
Mar 28, 2022 · The jury awarded each plaintiff $3 million in emotional distress damages and $4 million in punitive damages. Because the verdict shows a violation of Section 1981, as opposed to Title VII, there is no cap on damages. The former employees argued the company violated their rights as citizens because of their race.
