Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

  1. Sep 25, 2024 · Judicial misconduct is a serious breach of judicial ethics, including actions like bribery, bias, or abuse of power. Proving misconduct requires evidence and legal assistance. The definition of judicial misconduct is a serious deviation from the accepted practices of a judge in the judicial profession. Misconduct is defined as conduct which is ...

  2. Mar 8, 2016 · In both cases, the Court of Appeal considered whether the judge had properly addressed and decided the issues which were central to the matter. This may sound simple, but in the words of the tenant’s counsel in the Gulf Agencies case, the judge “did not grapple with the issue; he dodged it”. The Court of Appeal has made it plain that this ...

  3. Nov 3, 2015 · Judge Camp also criticized the Canadian legal position that a judge ought not to consider whether a complainant reports the assault immediately. As described in the Crown’s Factum: In the Crown’s preliminary submissions, the Trial Judge commented that the Complainant “abused the first opportunity to report” before conceding this was “no longer contemporarily relevant”.

    • Alice Woolley
  4. 669.1 (1) Where any judge, court or provincial court judge by whom or which the plea of the accused or defendant to an offence was taken has not commenced to hear evidence, any judge, court or provincial court judge having jurisdiction to try the accused or defendant has jurisdiction for the purpose of the hearing and adjudication. Adjournment ...

  5. May 18, 2016 · As Marshall noted, good manners in the face of an abusive judge will, at the very least, make the jury wonder why the judge is treating you unfairly. Similarly, Warin recommended attorneys not “flex” their muscles. Rather, the attorney would do better to find ways to make polite conversation or bring up topics in which the attorney knows ...

  6. People also ask

  7. Jan 12, 2017 · Justice Donald found the respondent’s attitude was “defiant”, and her attempts at compliance were “grudging, disobliging, tardy, and incomplete”. Accordingly, Justice Donald ordered the respondent to comply, and to pay a fine of $7,500, each within 30 days, with further penalties if the respondent did not comply.

  1. People also search for