Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

      • Paul argues that if there's no resurrection, then Christ Himself was not raised, and faith in Him would be pointless. But since Christ was raised, those who have died in Christ will also be resurrected. Paul ties this future resurrection to our present commitment to God, culminating in the defeat of all God's enemies.
      biblehub.com/chaptersummaries/1_corinthians/15.htm
  1. In 1 st Corinthians 15, the apostle Paul records the eyewitness accounts of the Lord Jesus Christ's resurrection: For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received: that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures, and that ...

    • Bob

      Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities...

  2. Jun 11, 2012 · The conclusion to Paul's argument in 1 Corinthians 15 ties the resurrection of the dead to God's triumphant victory over death, the last enemy (vv. 50–58). Paul reiterates what he has already said, when he states that "flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God, nor does the perishable inherit the imperishable" (v. 50).

    • Two Guiding Principles
    • Two Conclusions
    • Mormon View Undermines The Gospel
    • What Does It Mean?

    Two principles must guide us. First, we establish what we know and work from there. Second, our conclusions must fit the context of 1 Corinthians and cohere with Paul’s theology. Beginning with the context, Paul has heard some Corinthian Christians deny the future bodily resurrection of believers. Given how integral Jesus’s resurrection is to the g...

    Two conclusions emerge. First, just as Paul’s sacrifices presuppose the resurrection, so the Corinthians’ practice of baptism for the dead presupposes the resurrection. Second, since 1 Corinthians 15is about resurrection of the dead, not gaining salvation, the Mormons take the passage out of context. Additionally, since Paul doesn’t rebuke the Cori...

    These conclusions are sufficient to refute the Mormon view of baptism for the dead. Whatever baptism for the dead means, the practice of the Mormons cannot be correct, for it both disregards the biblical context and undermines the biblical gospel. Mormon baptism for the dead is a proxy administration of baptism for a deceased person who didn’t hear...

    Still, the question of the proper interpretation of baptism for the dead remains. Confessing I’m no closer to certainty than anyone, I think it wise to take the passage at face value: it seems that certain Corinthian were baptized on behalf of people—possibly family members or friends who’d died. Paul knew about this and, even if he didn’t fully ap...

    • Dan Doriani
  3. 1 Corinthians 15, one of the most profound chapters in the New Testament, presents Paul's defense of the resurrection of Jesus and its implications for believers. He asserts the importance of the resurrection as central to the Christian faith and the future hope of believers.

  4. Paul’s comment about people being “baptized for the dead” (1 Corinthians 15:29-34) has found its way into Mormon theology, where living people can be baptized in the place of their dead relatives to create a retroactive salvation for them. This has caused a great debate in Christianity as well.

  5. All of these truths concerning the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ, found in 1 Corinthians 15:3-8, were received by Paul prior to when he wrote 1 Corinthians and were then delivered by him to the Corinthians when he was on his second missionary journey.

  6. People also ask

  7. propose that Paul’s argument in 1 Cor 15:3654 is structured by twelve anti-thetically paired verbs (that is, six pairs of verbs) denoting death (or the mortal state) and resurrection (or the risen state) in vv. 36–49, followed by seven verbs denoting resurrection or transformation in vv. 50–54.

  1. People also search for