Search results
Oct 29, 2024 · A meta-narrative review seeks to illuminate a heterogeneous topic area by highlighting the contrasting and complementary ways in which researchers have studied the same or a similar topic" (Wong et al, 2013).
- Description of Panel and Items
- Scope of The Publication Standards
- How to Use These Publication Standards
In all, we recruited 33 individuals from 25 organizations in six countries. These comprised researchers in public or population health researchers (5); evidence synthesis (5); health services research (8); international development (2); education (2); and also research methodologists (6), publishing (1), nursing (2) and policy and decision making (...
These publication standards are intended to help researchers, authors, journal editors and policy and decision makers to know and understand what should be reported in the write-up of a meta-narrative review. They are not intended to provide detailed guidance on how to conduct such a review; for this we direct interested readers to other publicatio...
The layout of this document has drawn on previous methodological publications and in particular on the 'Explanations and Elaborations' document of the PRISMA statement . Each item is followed by an example drawn from published reviews and a rationale for its inclusion. The purpose of the example text is to illustrate how an item might be reported i...
- Geoff Wong, Trish Greenhalgh, Gill Westhorp, Jeanette Buckingham, Ray Pawson
- 2013
Jan 29, 2013 · This commentary considers two specific types of systematic review, meta-narrative synthesis and realist synthesis, to accompany the publication in BMC Medicine of publication standards for the reporting of such reviews.
- David Gough
- d.gough@ioe.ac.uk
- 2013
For details on how these quality standards were developed, please see: Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Pawson R..Development of methodological guidance, publication standards and training materials for realist and meta-narrative reviews: the RAMESES (Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses - Evolving Standards) project.
A meta-narrative review maps how a certain topic is understood in distinct ways, conducts a focused search to describe and compare narratives, and then seeks to make sense of how such narratives are interpreted across different disciplines or historical contexts, as part of the analysis. 9
Jan 29, 2013 · Using the language of dimensions of difference, meta-narrative reviews can be described as having three overlapping levels (or components). First is an iterative configuring map of the different traditions of research in an area.
People also ask
What is a meta-narrative review?
Are there any publication standards for the reporting of meta-narrative reviews?
What is a narrative review?
What makes a good narrative review?
How do you write a meta-narrative review?
What should be included in a narrative review?
training resources. for those seeking to use the realist and/or meta-narrative approach to systematic review. In this project we used a number of different approaches to develop our project outputs. We: collated and summarised existing literature on the principles of good practice in realist and meta-narrative systematic review;
