Search results
People also ask
What does 'ultimate concern' mean?
Where did the concept of ultimate concern come from?
What does Emmons say about ultimate concern?
Is ultimate concern a basis for understanding religion?
What makes 'ultimate concern' empirically observable world?
What does Tillich mean by ultimate concern?
Sep 19, 2020 · The influential twentieth-century Christian theologian and philosopher Paul Tillich presents his view of religion as being “ultimate concern.”. He writes that, “Religion, in the largest and most basic sense of the word, is ultimate concern.
Jan 1, 2020 · First, Emmons talks about ultimate concerns; the plural is a distinction that has important implications. For Tillich, the singular of ultimate concern indicated a consistency and unity in the ultimate concern that suggests that there cannot or should not be multiple ultimate concerns.
According to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Tillich believes the essence of religious attitudes is what he calls "ultimate concern". Separate from all profane and ordinary realities, the object of the concern is understood as sacred, numinous or holy.
Paul Tillich has defined faith as 'the state of being ultimately concerned' (Tillich, 1957b, p. 1). This is to define faith by its psychic character rather than by its specific content. Whatever is regarded as ultimately important in one's life is in effect the object or subject of one's faith.
- Stanley Grean
- 1993
For Tillich, God is “the answer to the question implied in being”; He is known when man is “in the state of ultimate concern.” By Tillich’s own testimony, if that concern is wrongly placed, philosophy and theology become destructive.
The concept of ultimate concern contains two distinct elements: 1. Concern should be ultimate. This seems to be an assertion that there should be an abundance of concern, or to put it more accurately, if not more precisely, man should be ultimately concerned. 2. But ultimately concerned about what? Here we find out what the norm is for ultimate ...
interpretation of "ultimate concern" as referring to a belief which occupied "the same place in the life of an objector as an orthodox belief in God" (at 184) indicated that a belief need not be theistic to be religious. This interpretation was confirmed by the Court's decision in Welsh v.
