Search results
review. The scope of the narrative review should be defined in the work. Though the standards of systematic reviewing cannot be applied to a work of such breadth, authors should identify evidence through unbiased methods and should document that they have done so, and that they have included all the relevant evidence that they have found. Title ...
While a systematic review often focuses on a narrow question in a specific context, with a prespecified method to synthesize findings from similar studies, a narrative review can include a wide variety of studies and provide an overall summary, with interpretation and critique. 1 Examples of narrative review types include state-of-the-art, critical, and integrative reviews, among many others.
Define Your Research Question. The first step in writing a narrative review is to define your research question. The research question should be specific, clear, and focused on the topic you wish to review. Consider what is already known about the topic and what could be added or improved through further research.
- What is a narrative review?
- Characteristics of an effective review
- PLANNING THE REVIEW
- Communicate with the journal editor
- Define purpose, audience, scope
- Plan the literature search
- Use the studies to plan the review structure
- Make an outline
- Example of organized headings
- Writing the introduction
- Writing the main text: synthesize
- Writing the main text: synthesize
- Writing the conclusion
- Writing the abstract
A summary, synthesis, or critique of the literature on a topic Distinct from a systematic review
Is based on a clear purpose Is well organized Brings a fresh perspective Benefits the reader
Talk to the journal editor. Define the purpose, audience, and scope. Plan and carry out a literature search. Use the literature to plan the review structure, then make an outline.
Before you write, communicate with the editor. For solicited reviews, the topic should be defined in the invitation. For unsolicited reviews, ask the editor whether your review would be welcome.
Purpose: discuss recent developments? resolve a debate? answer a question? Audience: experts or non-experts? within or outside your field? Scope: which question(s) will be addressed? to what depth? Examplesofreviews with variouspurposes Examplesofreviews with variousaudiences
Decide what kinds of articles you will look for before you start searching. Study designs or level of evidence Primary outcomes Databases Time period Get help from a librarian at the Research Medical Library.
Take notes on the selected studies. Organize the studies according to: A planned structure Themes A planned structure amended as more themes emerge Tools for organizing studies: A table Labels or annotations in a reference manager
Outline the main points. Use headings and subheadings. Chronologic General to particular Common to rare Most to least important Ensure that subheadings under a heading relate to that heading.
Introduction Disease Classification Genomic Landscape Prognostic Classification Factors Current Therapy Induction Therapy Consolidation Therapy Consolidation with Intensive Chemotherapy Allogeneic Hematopoietic-Cell Transplantation Transplantation Techniques Donor Graft and Cell Source Options Complications of Allotransplantation Relapse after Tran...
Establish the rationale for the review. State the purpose, which should: Flow logically from the rationale. Guide the rest of the review. Keep it short.
“The foundation of researched writing is always the writer’s own ideas, which flow from point to point, supported and guided by research.” –Hodges’ Harbrace Handbook Writing the main text: synthesize Summarize individual studies by restating the main points in your own words. Paraphrase a statement from a study by restating the same information in ...
Use transitions to signal similarities, contrasts, or other relationships between studies. (Examples: however, in contrast, likewise, similarly, furthermore, moreover) Interpret each group of findings as a whole. Identify areas where more research is needed.
End with a conclusion that corresponds to the purpose of the review and is based on the presented material. The conclusion may be followed by a few sentences that emphasize areas where more research is needed.
The abstract of a review is typically unstructured but should contain these elements: Background and rationale Purpose Can also include: Key points made Conclusion
A narrative review is a type of manuscript whose purpose is to summarize, synthesize, or critique the literature on a topic. Unlike a systematic review, a narrative review has very few formal constraints for selecting studies and assessing their evidence. Before you start writing, it’s best to communicate with the editor of the target journal ...
Objective: To describe and discuss the process used to write a narrative review of the literature for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Publication of narrative overviews of the literature should be standardized to increase their objectivity. Background: In the past decade numerous changes in research methodology pertaining to reviews of ...
People also ask
What should be included in a narrative review?
How do you conduct a narrative review?
What makes a good narrative review?
What is a narrative review?
What is the scope of a narrative review?
What are the different types of narrative reviews?
Researchers should be clear and explicit about the choices they made, how they conducted screening, and which team members were involved. Authors should also consider how they assessed the quality of articles included in the review. Sampling. Narrative reviews include a noncomprehensive and non-exhaustive sample of the literature on a specific ...
