Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

1. stackoverflow.com › questions › 3327885F# vs IronPython: When is one preferred to the other?

   stackoverflow.com › questions › 3327885

   Jul 25, 2010 · Point for IronPython. F# can be used to build more convenient libraries, easier to access from other .Net languages. So for a .Net residing library I would prefer F#. Cross-platform development. IronPython is better here. F#/Mono is usable is a much smaller set of platforms and F#/OCaml compatibility is not easy to maintain especially in terms ...

2. www.youtube.com › watchPYTHON : F# vs IronPython: When is one preferred to the other?

   www.youtube.com › watch

   • Cached

   May 27, 2023 · PYTHON : F# vs IronPython: When is one preferred to the other?To Access My Live Chat Page, On Google, Search for "hows tech developer connect"So here is a se...

   • Video Duration: 2 min
   • Views: 9

   • Author: Hey Delphi

3. www.itwriting.com › blog › 2158-why-f-rather-thanWhy F# rather than IronPython in Visual Studio 2010?

   www.itwriting.com › blog › 2158-why-f-rather-than

   • Cached

   The difference between F# and IronPython/Ruby is that F# was basically ready when VS2010 was being planned (late 2007), and already had some VS integration they could build off of. IronPython 2.0 (the first DLR-based release) was still in Alpha at that time, with no VS integration.

4. www.reddit.com › f2ajfg › ironpython_worth_itIronPython worth it? : r/dotnet - Reddit

   www.reddit.com › f2ajfg › ironpython_worth_it

   • Cached

   IronPython is a pretty much a zombie project. They are way behind schedule for releasing a Python 3.x compatible version and Python 2.x is no longer supported by the broader community. If those APIs are written in Python 2.x you might get away with it, but it's not a long term solution. 3.

5. softwareengineering.stackexchange.com › questionsWhat are some alternative methods to IronPython for calling ...

   softwareengineering.stackexchange.com › questions

   Oct 24, 2011 · Realizing that Python is a dynamic language, which makes it difficult to mix with a (largely) statically typed language like C# (though this is seemingly getting easier with .NET 4.0), there are options like IronPython which can help match up the two languages. I've never come across any other options for dovetailing Python libraries with .NET.

6. www.reddit.com › 1z8oi › f_versus_ironpythonF# versus IronPython : r/programming - Reddit

   www.reddit.com › 1z8oi › f_versus_ironpython

   • Cached

   10 votes, 21 comments. 6.1M subscribers in the programming community. Computer Programming

7. People also ask

   Which is better IronPython or F#?

   • Point for IronPython. F# can be used to build more convenient libraries, easier to access from other .Net languages. So for a .Net residing library I would prefer F#. Cross-platform development. IronPython is better here.

   F# vs IronPython: When is one preferred to the other?

   stackoverflow.com/questions/3327885/f-vs-ironpython-when-is-one-preferred-to-the-other

   See all results for this question

   What is the difference between Python for net and IronPython?

   • What is the difference between Python for .NET and IronPython? IronPython was/is an implementation of the Python programming language for Microsoft's Common Language Runtime (aka .NET) written in the C# programming language. As such, IronPython can make use of other .NET libraries implemented in C#/F#/etc.

   What is better, Python or .NET? - Quora

   www.quora.com/What-is-better-Python-or-NET

   See all results for this question

   Is IronPython a good choice?

   • If IronPython isn't a good match, Python for .Net might work for you. It integrates the CPython runtime (and thus any Python libraries, including native libraries that run under CPython) into your .Net process. . Net objects can call Python objects, and vice versa, without too much trouble.

   How to integrate Python Code with C#.Net Core language?

   stackoverflow.com/questions/51994094/how-to-integrate-python-code-with-c-net-core-language

   See all results for this question

   Is iron Python faster than F#?

   • As you said, Iron Python is slower than F# due to the lack of static typing. In the Computer Language Benchmarks, Iron Python is 25x in the median, and 120x slower in the worst case. So if runtime performance is a consideration, F# is likely preferable. Since both are .NET, each can use the libraries of the other with just a little work.

   F# vs IronPython: When is one preferred to the other?

   stackoverflow.com/questions/3327885/f-vs-ironpython-when-is-one-preferred-to-the-other

   See all results for this question

   Is IronPython a powerful programming language?

   • IronPython demonstrates the power and breadth of Python's flexibility when used in conjunction with . NET. Using IronPython from the interactive interpreter allows for experimenting with . NET classes, even when coding in straight C#.

   IronPython in Action - Internet Archive

   ia801706.us.archive.org/18/items/python-books/ironpython.in.action.michael.foord.2009.pdf

   See all results for this question

   What is the difference between iron Python and F#?

   • F# is statically typed, while Iron Python is not. The foundation of F# is functional programming while the foundation of Iron Python is object-oriented programming. (With both having good support for other-paradigms.) These are relatively major differences, and they directly lead to the main practical reasons to prefer one over the other.

   F# vs IronPython: When is one preferred to the other?

   stackoverflow.com/questions/3327885/f-vs-ironpython-when-is-one-preferred-to-the-other

   See all results for this question

8. www.codemag.com › 0809071 › Introducing-IronPythonIntroducing IronPython - CODE Mag

   www.codemag.com › 0809071 › Introducing-IronPython

   • Cached

   Aug 22, 2008 · Inside the unzipped files you’ll find the main IronPython executable, ipy.exe. If you run that with no arguments, you get an interactive console window where you can start typing Python code directly. Alternatively, you can pass the name of a python file as the first argument, and IronPython will execute that code.