Search results
Dec 14, 2021 · Dr. Stewart is responsible for 100 per cent of the costs of the investigation and hearing, totalling $38,538.18. Dr. Stewart must, at his own expense, undergo an assessment by a forensic psychiatrist chosen by CPSA’s Complaints Director, to assess Dr. Stewart’s risk of re-offending and recommend mitigation strategies.
- Dr. Bradley Jack Stewart sanctioned for inappropriate ... - CPSA
Edmonton, AB – Edmonton neurologist Dr. Bradley Jack Stewart...
- DECISION OF THE HEARING TRIBUNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS ...
Tab 5: Undertaking for Chaperone by Dr. Stewart dated March...
- Dr. Bradley Jack Stewart sanctioned for inappropriate ... - CPSA
Nov 21, 2023 · Edmonton, AB – Edmonton neurologist Dr. Bradley Jack Stewart was found guilty of unprofessional conduct by a CPSA Hearing Tribunal, for failing to maintain a professional relationship with a patient. Dr. Stewart was accused of violating appropriate boundaries between 2011 and 2013, which included sending a patient improper text messages and emails, and providing personal...
Tab 5: Undertaking for Chaperone by Dr. Stewart dated March 24, 2016 Tab 6: Response from Dr. Stewart dated July 19, 2016 Tab 7: Dr. Stewart’s patient chart Tab 8: Alberta Health billing information re visits with Dr. Stewart between January 2011 and October 2013 Tab 9: Emails exchanged between Dr. Stewart and the Complainant – 28 page
the Investigated Member was out of practice for four months. 20. Counsel for the Complaints Director submitted that the following decision supported a six-month suspension: • Wachtler v. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta, 2012 ABCA 145 . 21. Dr. Wachtler had a previous discipline finding against him, and there were conditions on ...
sufficient to protect patients. As a result, CPSA has taken action to secure Dr. Stewart’s withdrawal from practice. Resources: CPSA Hearing Tribunal decision – 2013 – 30 – The College of Physicians & Surgeons of Alberta is the regulator for all physicians and surgeons in the province and is governed by the Health Professions Act.
- 89KB
- 1
Apr 9, 2021 · In an April 7 decision in which the court found the evidence inadmissible, Justice Adam Germain wrote what the Crown tried to include in Bradley Jack Stewart’s trial is precisely the type of evidence the Supreme Court of Canada and the Alberta Court of Appeal directed judges to be cautious about and to maintain a gatekeeper function.
People also ask
Why was Dr Stewart sanctioned by a different CPSA hearing Tribunal?
Did CPSA file a complaint against Dr Stewart?
What did Dr Stewart admit?
Why is CPSA investigating Dr Stewart?
Why was Dr Stewart sanctioned for unprofessional conduct?
Can Dr Stewart see patients during a suspension period?
Feb 28, 2013 · A hearing tribunal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta ruled Dr. Bradley Stewart, 52, violated the college’s standards of practice when he ended a patient-physician relationship with a woman to pursue a sexual relationship with her.
