Search results
loc.gov
- The late 19th and early 20th centuries marked the political marginalization of many indigenous populations in the United States. Aided by reports from Native informants who agreed to serve as collectors and intermediaries about their culture, anthropologists began collecting indigenous artifacts and information about Native languages and culture.
today.uconn.edu/2011/08/the-impact-of-anthropology-on-native-american-culture/
find that Vine Deloria's (1960) diatribe against the "tribe" of Anthropologists caused some to no longer refer to us as "my" Indians. Some no longer flaunted their "adoption" by "their Indian family. . ." However, some of us "native" anthropologists were put in a triple bind - other than being Native and an
Aug 19, 2011 · Aided by reports from Native informants who agreed to serve as collectors and intermediaries about their culture, anthropologists began collecting indigenous artifacts and information about Native languages and culture.
In the Indian subcontinent, the problem is more observed due to the pervasive reality of what the Indian anthropologists call as ‘tribes in transition’ or the tribe-caste continuum.
Mar 28, 2022 · By 1969, anthropologists were so ubiquitous on reservations that noted scholar and Standing Rock Sioux Tribe member Vine Deloria, Jr., quipped, “Indians have been cursed above all other...
Having been inspired by the work of Sol Tax a number of Indian anthropologists began action anthropological research in India. Notable among them are Prof. L.P. Vidyarthi and Prof P.K. Bhowmik. Prof. Vidyarthi introduced action anthropology research programme among the tribes of Bihar.
3. In anthropological perspective Bose (1941) drew attention that how tribes get attracted themselves to societies by mixing themselves in production to the non-tribal society which provided them protection and security. According to Bose by this tribes got absorbed to larger Indian society called it “Hindu Mode of absorption”.
explores the historiography of the Native Americans through writings in both history and anthropology. It also attempts to explain why an-thropologists, and not historians, have until recently shaped this history and why an increasing number of Native Americans are critical of what passes as their history.
